![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
无创通气:避免失败,改善预后 Non-invasive ventilation: reducing failures and improving outcome |
Laurent Brochard |
||||
| Medical ICU, AP-HP, Albert Chenevier - Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Créteil; | |||||
| Paris 12 University, Créteil ; INSERM unit 955, Créteil, France | |||||
| Address correspondence to | |||||
| Pr Laurent Brochard | |||||
| Service de réanimation médicale | |||||
| CHU Henri Mondor, 94000 Créteil, France | |||||
| Tel: +33 1 49 81 23 89 Fax: +33 1 42 07 99 43 | |||||
| E-mail: laurent.brochard@hmn.aphp.fr | |||||
| Abstract | |||||
| The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients who present with an acute exacerbation of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a fundamental pillar in the supportive treatment1 Nowadays is a routine clinical approach in these acutely ill patients. | |||||
| The use of NIV is also beneficial for patients with the asphyxic forms of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and as a preventive measure after extubation to avoid the risk of reintubation in at risk patients. | |||||
| During NIV, pressure support is the most frequently used mode of ventilation, most often in association with PEEP. | |||||
| In patients with acute exacerbation of COPD it seems there is no identified risk of trying NIV even at a late stage. | |||||
| Taking more attention to sleep quality of COPD patients treated by NIV may be important for their outcome. | |||||
| Severe forms of exacerbations associated with hypercapnic coma can be treated with this technique under careful monitoring. | |||||
| A possible risk of adverse outcome associated with delayed endotracheal intubation in patients who fail a trial of NIV has not been identified in COPD, by contrast to patients with de novo acute respiratory failure2. | |||||
| Future avenues should consider improvements in patient-ventilator interfaces3, reduction in asynchronies through more fefficient algorithm for dealing with leaks4, use of helium-oxygen mixtures5, and better understanding of late failures, after initial success. | |||||
| Last, an unresolved but important question concerns the possibility to continue NIV out of the hospital for patients who benefited for an acute treatment with NIV. | |||||
| References | |||||
| 1. | Brochard L, Mancebo J, Elliott MW: Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2002; 19: 712-21 | ||||
| 2. | Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L: Benefits and risks of success or failure of noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 1756-65 | ||||
| 3. | Tarabini Fraticelli A, Lellouche F, L’Her E, Taillé S, Mancebo J, Brochard L: Physiological effects of different interfaces during noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2008; In press | ||||
| 4. | Vignaux L, Vargas F, Roeseler J, Tassaux D, Thille AW, Kossowsky MP, Brochard L, Jolliet P: Patient-ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 840-6 | ||||
| 5. | Maggiore SM, Richard JC, Abroug F, Diehl JL, Antonelli M, Sauder P, Mancebo J, Ferrer M, Lellouche F, Lecourt L, Beduneau G, Brochard L: A multicenter, randomized trial of noninvasive ventilation with helium-oxygen mixture in exacerbations of chronic obstructive lung disease*. Crit Care Med 2009 | ||||
版权所有© 2006-2009,中国病理生理学会危重病医学专业委员会 Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine
|
|||||